http://www.shaneabrahams.com/2009/01/is-north-korea-helping-burma-build-a-secret-underground-weapon/
Burma’s military is reportedly building a network of underground tunnels between Naypyidaw, the country’s administrative capital and the town of Pin Laung in Shan State. According to the Democratic Voice of Burma, local residents speculate the tunnels are part of a secret weapons project, while workers report the project is being constructed with the assistance of North Korean scientists.
Work on the site has been going on for about three months, with three teams of workers from different parts of Burma. One worker said they were digging a very large tunnel with four main entrances to it. Inside the tunnel there were a lot of different sectors with maze-like paths scattered all around and also some parking lots.
He also reported often seeing North Koreans there, about every five days.
Visitors to the site from Naypyidaw have to pass through five military checkpoints, while troops and anti-aircraft batteries have been deployed on surrounding hilltops.
However, workers, who are forced to live on the site, complain they have not been paid for two months. DVB quotes one worker as saying, “They promised us 30,000 kyat a month for our labour
but they haven’t paid us since November last year and they also kept our ID cards so we can’t leave the site.”
Several years ago, I met a Burmese exile, who claimed the military were trying to acquire nuclear weapon technology from the Russians and that work had begun on a secret site inside Burma.
The junta moved the country’s capital from Rangoon to remote Naypyidaw in 2005. And many analysts speculate the move was due to the junta’s paranoia over a possible attack by the US.
Given President George W. Bush’s willingness to invade Iraq based on flimsier evidence than this, one wonders how the incoming Obama administration will view this latest news.
Where there's political will, there is a way
စစ္မွန္တဲ့ခိုင္မာတဲ့နိုင္ငံေရးခံယူခ်က္ရိွရင္ႀကိဳးစားမႈရိွရင္ နိုင္ငံေရးအေျဖ
ထြက္ရပ္လမ္းဟာေသခ်ာေပါက္ရိွတယ္
Burmese Translation-Phone Hlaing-fwubc
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Is North Korea helping Burma build a secret underground weapon?
第55回ビルマ市民フォーラム例会のご案内:外国人労働者は今・・在日ビルマ人・外国人労働者のおかれている状況について
【転送・転載大歓迎】
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
■第55回ビルマ市民フォーラム例会のご案内
<2月21日(土) 18時~/ 東京・池袋>
 ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
外国人労働者は今・・・
在日ビルマ人・外国人労働者のおかれている状況について
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
◆日時=2009年2月21日(土)午後6時~午後8時30分
*午後5時45分開場
◆会場= 池袋・ECOとしま(豊島区立生活産業プラザ)
8階 多目的ホール
*所在: 豊島区東池袋1-20-15、Tel 03-5992-7011
*交通: 池袋駅東口徒歩5分
地図:http://www.city.toshima.lg.jp/shisetsu/shisetsu_community/005133.html
◆資料代= 200円(会員)・500円(非会員)
◆定 員= 80名 (事前申込み不要/先着順)
 ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
次回、PFB例会では、以下、2つをテーマに実施いたします。
参加申込は不要です。ぜひお越しください。
①「在日ビルマ人や外国人労働者のおかれている状況について」
…ティンウィンさん(在日ビルマ市民労働組合会長/PFB運営委員)
昨今の経済危機により、日本人のみならず多くの在日ビルマ人や在日
外国人も厳しい状況におかれています。昨年末には日本人の雇用など
に関する報道が大きくなされましたが、その影で、多くの在日外国人
労働者もまた、日本人よりもさらに厳しい状況におかれています。
こうした状況や在日外国人労働者の思いを多くの方に知っていただくため、
ビルマ人の労働組合の会長として日々様々な相談や対応に追われている
在日ビルマ難民ティンウィンさんに、ビルマ人のみならず、群馬県を
中心にした外国人労働者の状況について、お話ししていただきます。
②「在日ビルマ難民のおかれている現状と展望(仮題)」
…渡辺 先生(弁護士/ビルマ弁護団事務局長/PFB事務局長)」
2008年のビルマ人難民認定申請者の状況について報告します。
また、日本政府は昨年、紛争や弾圧を逃れて他国に避難している難民を
受け入れる「第三国定住プログラム」の開始を正式に決定し、2010年
にはタイの難民キャンプで暮らすビルマ難民30人程を日本に受け入れ
るわけですが、そういった新しい動きも含め、日本の難民認定制度に
おける今後の課題や展望をお話いたします。
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
★PFBでは、日本人と在日ビルマ人を対象に、時々のビルマ情勢や
在日ビルマ難民の抱える問題などをテーマに、隔月で例会を実施して
おります。会員・非会員を問わず、どたなでもご参加いただけます。
初めての方でもぜひお気軽にご参加ください。
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
以上
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
◇ ビルマ市民フォーラム事務局 ◇
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
〒160-0004
東京都新宿区四谷一丁目18番地6 四谷1丁目ウエストビル4階
いずみ橋法律事務所内
電話03-5312-4817(直)/ FAX:03―5312-4543
E-mail: pfb@xsj.biglobe.ne.jp
ホームページ: http://www1.jca.apc.org/pfb/index.htm
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Obama takes office, saying choose 'hope over fear'
WASHINGTON – Stepping into history, Barack Hussein Obama grasped the reins of power as America's first black president on Tuesday, saying the nation must choose "hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord" to overcome the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
In frigid temperatures, an exuberant crowd of more than a million packed the National Mall and parade route to celebrate Obama's inauguration in a high-noon ceremony. They filled the National Mall, stretching from the inaugural platform at the U.S. Capitol to the Lincoln Memorial in the distance.
With 11 million Americans out of work and trillions of dollars lost in the stock market's tumble, Obama emphasized that his biggest challenge is to repair the tattered economy left behind by outgoing President George W. Bush.
"Our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions — that time has surely passed," Obama said in an undisguised shot at Bush administration policies. "Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off and begin the work of remaking America."
The dawn of the new Democratic era — with Obama allies in charge of both houses of Congress — ends eight years of Republican control of the White House by Bush, who leaves Washington as one of the nation's most unpopular and divisive presidents, the architect of two unfinished wars and the man in charge at a time of economic calamity that swept away many Americans' jobs, savings and homes.
Obama's election was cheered around the world as a sign that America will be more embracing, more open to change. "To the Muslim world," Obama said, "we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect."
Still, he bluntly warned, "To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society's ills on the West — know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy."
"To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history, but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist."
Two years after beginning his improbable quest as a little-known, first-term Illinois senator with a foreign-sounding name, Obama moved into the Oval Office as the nation's fourth youngest president, at 47, and the first African-American, a barrier-breaking achievement believed impossible by generations of minorities.
He said it was a moment to recall "that all are equal, all are free and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness."
Obama called for a political truce in Washington to end "the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics."
He said that all Americans have roles in rebuilding the nation by renewing the traditions of hard work, honesty and fair play, tolerance, loyalty and patriotism.
"What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility, a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task."
With the economy in a long and deepening recession, Obama said it was time for swift and bold action to create new jobs and lay a foundation for growth. Congressional Democrats have readied an $825 billion stimulus plan of tax cuts and spending for roads, bridges, schools, electric grids and other projects.
"The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works," the new president said.
A mighty chorus of cheers erupted as Obama stepped to the inaugural platform, a midday sun warming the crowd that had waited for hours in the cold. There were some boos when Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney came onto the platform.
In his remarks, Obama took stock of the nation's sobering problems.
"That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood," he said.
"Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age," Obama said. "Homes have been lost, jobs shed, businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly, our schools fail too many, and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet."
It was the first change of administrations since the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Crowds filled the Mall for a distant glimpse of the proceedings or just, in the words of many, simply "to be here." Washington's subway system was jammed and two downtown stations were closed when a woman was struck by a subway train.
Bush — following tradition — left a note for Obama in the top drawer of his desk in the Oval Office.
White House press secretary Dana Perino said the theme of the message — which Bush wrote on Monday — was similar to what he has said since election night: that Obama is about to begin a "fabulous new chapter" in the United States, and that he wishes him well.
The unfinished business of the Bush administration thrusts an enormous burden onto the new administration, though polls show Americans are confident Obama is on track to succeed. He has cautioned that improvements will take time and that things will get worse before they get better.
Culminating four days of celebration, the nation's 56th inauguration day began for Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden with a traditional morning worship service at St. John's Episcopal Church, across Lafayette Park from the White House. Bells pealed from the historic church's tower as Obama and his wife, Michelle, arrived five minutes behind schedule.
The festivities won't end until well after midnight, with dancing and partying at 10 inaugural balls.
By custom, Obama and his wife, and Biden and his wife, Jill, went directly from church to the White House for coffee with Bush and his wife, Laura. Michelle Obama brought a gift for the outgoing first lady in a white box decorated with a red ribbon.
Shortly before 11 a.m., Obama and Bush climbed into a heavily armored Cadillac limousine to share a ride to the Capitol for the transfer of power, an event flashed around the world in television and radio broadcasts, podcasts and Internet streaming. On Monday, Vice President Dick Cheney pulled a muscle in his back, leaving him in a wheelchair for the inauguration.
Just after noon, Obama stepped forward on the West Front of the Capitol to lay his left hand on the same Bible that President Abraham Lincoln used at his first inauguration in 1861. The 35-word oath of office, administered by Chief Justice John Roberts, has been uttered by every president since George Washington. Obama was one of 22 Democratic senators to vote against Roberts' confirmation to the Supreme Court in 2005.
The son of a white, Kansas-born mother and a black, Kenya-born father, Obama decided to use his full name in the swearing-in ceremony.
To the dismay of liberals, Obama invited conservative evangelical pastor Rick Warren — an opponent of gay rights — to give the inaugural invocation.
About a dozen members of Obama's Cabinet and top appointees were ready for Senate confirmation Tuesday, provided no objections were raised. But Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas indicated he would block a move to immediately confirm Secretary of State-designate Hillary Rodham Clinton. Still, she is expected to be approved in a roll call vote Wednesday.
More than 10,000 people from all 50 states — including bands and military units — were assembled to follow Obama and Biden from the Capitol on the 1.5-mile inaugural parade route on Pennsylvania Avenue, concluding at a bulletproof reviewing stand in front of the White House. Security was unprecedented. Most bridges into Washington and about 3.5 square miles of downtown were closed.
Among the VIPs at the Capitol was pilot Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, the hero of last week's US Airways crash into the Hudson River.
Obama's inauguration represents a time of renewal and optimism for a nation gripped by fear and anxiety. Stark numbers tell the story of an economic debacle unrivaled since the 1930s:
_Eleven million people have lost their jobs, pushing the unemployment rate to 7.2 percent, a 16-year high.
_One in 10 U.S. homeowners is delinquent on mortgage payments or in arrears.
_The Dow Jones industrial average fell by 33.8 percent in 2008, the worst decline since 1931, and stocks lost $10 trillion in value between October 2007 and November 2008.
Obama and congressional Democrats are working on an $825 billion economic recovery bill that would provide an enormous infusion of public spending and tax cuts. Obama also will have at his disposal the remaining $350 billion in the federal financial bailout fund. His goal is to save or create 3 million jobs and put banks back in the job of lending to customers.
In an appeal for bipartisanship, Obama honored defeated Republican presidential rival John McCain at a dinner Monday night. "There are few Americans who understand this need for common purpose and common effort better than John McCain," Obama said.
Young and untested, Obama is a man of enormous confidence and electrifying oratorical skills. Hopes for Obama are extremely high, suggesting that Americans are willing to give him a long honeymoon to strengthen the economy and lift the financial gloom.
On Wednesday, his first working day in office, Obama is expected to redeem his campaign promise to begin the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq under a 16-month timetable. Aides said he would summon the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Oval Office and order that the pullout commence.
___
Associated Press Writers Alan Fram, Donna Cassata, Gillian Gaynair, Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Kevin Freking, Ed Tobias, Ben Evans, Seth Borenstein and H. Josef Hebert contributed to this report.
Obama takes office, saying choose 'hope over fear'
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090120/ap_on_go_pr_wh/inauguration_rdp
http://news.yahoo.com/
Slideshow: Presidential Inauguration Play Video Video: LIVE - Barack Obama’s inauguration ceremony ABC News Play Video Video: Celebrities party for Obama Reuters AP – President Barack Obama gives his inaugural address at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 20, … WASHINGTON – Stepping into history, Barack Hussein Obama grasped the reins of power as America's first black president on Tuesday, saying the nation must choose "hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord" to overcome the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
In frigid temperatures, an exuberant crowd of more than a million packed the National Mall and parade route to celebrate Obama's inauguration in a high-noon ceremony. They filled the National Mall, stretching from the inaugural platform at the U.S. Capitol to the Lincoln Memorial in the distance.
With 11 million Americans out of work and trillions of dollars lost in the stock market's tumble, Obama emphasized that his biggest challenge is to repair the tattered economy left behind by outgoing President George W. Bush.
"Our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions — that time has surely passed," Obama said in an undisguised shot at Bush administration policies. "Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off and begin the work of remaking America."
The dawn of the new Democratic era — with Obama allies in charge of both houses of Congress — ends eight years of Republican control of the White House by Bush, who leaves Washington as one of the nation's most unpopular and divisive presidents, the architect of two unfinished wars and the man in charge at a time of economic calamity that swept away many Americans' jobs, savings and homes.
Obama's election was cheered around the world as a sign that America will be more embracing, more open to change. "To the Muslim world," Obama said, "we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect."
Still, he bluntly warned, "To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict, or blame their society's ills on the West — know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy."
"To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history, but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist."
Two years after beginning his improbable quest as a little-known, first-term Illinois senator with a foreign-sounding name, Obama moved into the Oval Office as the nation's fourth youngest president, at 47, and the first African-American, a barrier-breaking achievement believed impossible by generations of minorities.
He said it was a moment to recall "that all are equal, all are free and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness."
Obama called for a political truce in Washington to end "the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics."
He said that all Americans have roles in rebuilding the nation by renewing the traditions of hard work, honesty and fair play, tolerance, loyalty and patriotism.
"What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility, a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task."
With the economy in a long and deepening recession, Obama said it was time for swift and bold action to create new jobs and lay a foundation for growth. Congressional Democrats have readied an $825 billion stimulus plan of tax cuts and spending for roads, bridges, schools, electric grids and other projects.
"The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works," the new president said.
A mighty chorus of cheers erupted as Obama stepped to the inaugural platform, a midday sun warming the crowd that had waited for hours in the cold. There were some boos when Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney came onto the platform.
In his remarks, Obama took stock of the nation's sobering problems.
"That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood," he said.
"Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age," Obama said. "Homes have been lost, jobs shed, businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly, our schools fail too many, and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet."
It was the first change of administrations since the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Crowds filled the Mall for a distant glimpse of the proceedings or just, in the words of many, simply "to be here." Washington's subway system was jammed and two downtown stations were closed when a woman was struck by a subway train.
Bush — following tradition — left a note for Obama in the top drawer of his desk in the Oval Office.
White House press secretary Dana Perino said the theme of the message — which Bush wrote on Monday — was similar to what he has said since election night: that Obama is about to begin a "fabulous new chapter" in the United States, and that he wishes him well.
The unfinished business of the Bush administration thrusts an enormous burden onto the new administration, though polls show Americans are confident Obama is on track to succeed. He has cautioned that improvements will take time and that things will get worse before they get better.
Culminating four days of celebration, the nation's 56th inauguration day began for Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden with a traditional morning worship service at St. John's Episcopal Church, across Lafayette Park from the White House. Bells pealed from the historic church's tower as Obama and his wife, Michelle, arrived five minutes behind schedule.
The festivities won't end until well after midnight, with dancing and partying at 10 inaugural balls.
By custom, Obama and his wife, and Biden and his wife, Jill, went directly from church to the White House for coffee with Bush and his wife, Laura. Michelle Obama brought a gift for the outgoing first lady in a white box decorated with a red ribbon.
Shortly before 11 a.m., Obama and Bush climbed into a heavily armored Cadillac limousine to share a ride to the Capitol for the transfer of power, an event flashed around the world in television and radio broadcasts, podcasts and Internet streaming. On Monday, Vice President Dick Cheney pulled a muscle in his back, leaving him in a wheelchair for the inauguration.
Just after noon, Obama stepped forward on the West Front of the Capitol to lay his left hand on the same Bible that President Abraham Lincoln used at his first inauguration in 1861. The 35-word oath of office, administered by Chief Justice John Roberts, has been uttered by every president since George Washington. Obama was one of 22 Democratic senators to vote against Roberts' confirmation to the Supreme Court in 2005.
The son of a white, Kansas-born mother and a black, Kenya-born father, Obama decided to use his full name in the swearing-in ceremony.
To the dismay of liberals, Obama invited conservative evangelical pastor Rick Warren — an opponent of gay rights — to give the inaugural invocation.
About a dozen members of Obama's Cabinet and top appointees were ready for Senate confirmation Tuesday, provided no objections were raised. But Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas indicated he would block a move to immediately confirm Secretary of State-designate Hillary Rodham Clinton. Still, she is expected to be approved in a roll call vote Wednesday.
More than 10,000 people from all 50 states — including bands and military units — were assembled to follow Obama and Biden from the Capitol on the 1.5-mile inaugural parade route on Pennsylvania Avenue, concluding at a bulletproof reviewing stand in front of the White House. Security was unprecedented. Most bridges into Washington and about 3.5 square miles of downtown were closed.
Among the VIPs at the Capitol was pilot Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger, the hero of last week's US Airways crash into the Hudson River.
Obama's inauguration represents a time of renewal and optimism for a nation gripped by fear and anxiety. Stark numbers tell the story of an economic debacle unrivaled since the 1930s:
_Eleven million people have lost their jobs, pushing the unemployment rate to 7.2 percent, a 16-year high.
_One in 10 U.S. homeowners is delinquent on mortgage payments or in arrears.
_The Dow Jones industrial average fell by 33.8 percent in 2008, the worst decline since 1931, and stocks lost $10 trillion in value between October 2007 and November 2008.
Obama and congressional Democrats are working on an $825 billion economic recovery bill that would provide an enormous infusion of public spending and tax cuts. Obama also will have at his disposal the remaining $350 billion in the federal financial bailout fund. His goal is to save or create 3 million jobs and put banks back in the job of lending to customers.
In an appeal for bipartisanship, Obama honored defeated Republican presidential rival John McCain at a dinner Monday night. "There are few Americans who understand this need for common purpose and common effort better than John McCain," Obama said.
Young and untested, Obama is a man of enormous confidence and electrifying oratorical skills. Hopes for Obama are extremely high, suggesting that Americans are willing to give him a long honeymoon to strengthen the economy and lift the financial gloom.
On Wednesday, his first working day in office, Obama is expected to redeem his campaign promise to begin the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq under a 16-month timetable. Aides said he would summon the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Oval Office and order that the pullout commence.
___
Associated Press Writers Alan Fram, Donna Cassata, Gillian Gaynair, Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Kevin Freking, Ed Tobias, Ben Evans, Seth Borenstein and H. Josef Hebert contributed to this report.
Is China's influence on Burmese generals eroding?
http://www.mizzima.com/news/regional/1576-is-chinas-influence-on-burmese-generals-eroding.html
by Mungpi
Tuesday, 20 January 2009 20:57
New Delhi (Mizzima) - Though it may seem to many, including the international community, that China, Burma's strongest ally, is the only country that can influence the rogue military rulers of Burma, an analyst said, China is also currently facing a tough situation as the Burmese generals are stupid and stubborn and do not do what they are asked to by their elder brother – China.
Mya Maung a long time Sino-Burmese analyst based along the two countries' border in Ruili, during an interview with Mizzima said China is currently in a tight spot as the Burmese regime is stubbornly refusing to follow its suggestions.
Surprisingly, he said, China's suggestions to Burmese military rulers include implementing an inclusive political dialogue with opposition groups, as well as to reconsider the constitution, which the junta had claimed was approved during a referendum in May.
"But the problem is China has its own national interests to think of at and they are not in a position to put too much pressures on the junta," Mya Maung said.
According to him, among many economic ventures that China seeks in Burma, connecting a gas pipeline from Burma's western Arakan state to Yunnan province and using the Sittwe port as a sea gateway, are crucial.
"China may seem to be endorsing the junta's roadmap, but it is more concerned that there is some kind of stability in the country," Mya Maung said.
He said the Chinese government sees that the United Nations' initiative is ideal for Burma's political solution as it has strongly opposed the Western nations' way of pressuring the junta with economic sanctions.
China believes in engagement but would like a strong and stable government that would be accountable, Mya Maung said.
Currently, the United States and European Union has imposed economic sanctions on Burma's military rulers.
Complimenting Mya Maung's analysis, a secret document leaked to Mizzima reveals that China's ambassador to Burma Mr. Juan Mu urged the Burmese Foreign Minister, during one of their meetings in early last year, to cooperate with the UN special envoy Ibrahim Gambari and follow his suggestions on political reforms.
The meetings minutes between Burmese Foreign Minister Nyan Win and Ambassador Juan Mu, reveals that the Chinese ambassador had urged Nyan Win to allow Gambari to play a greater role by allowing him a tripartite meeting with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and liaison minister Aung Kyi, and to allow him multiple-entry Visa to Burma, and to open a liaison office in Rangoon.
Juan Mu also said, China is endorsing the United Nations initiative and would be ready to provide necessary support to the special envoy Ibrahim Gambari.
But Nyan Win, yet another puppet Foreign Minister of the Junta's paramount leader Senior General Than Shwe, refused the request saying a tripartite meeting between Gambari, Aung Kyi and Aung San Suu Kyi is impossible but assured meetings with junior junta officials.
Nyan Win, during the conversation with Juan Mu, also said Gambari cannot be given multiple entry Visa to Burma and the regime could not allow him to have a liaison office in Rangoon.
Juan Mu, representing the voice of China, however, told Nyan Win that China fully understood Burma's situation and would use its influence to convince the international community particularly the diplomatic community in Rangoon on the junta's planned roadmap.
Mya Maung said, though China wants to see a stable Burma, in recent days it has failed to influence the junta, led by Senior General Than Shwe, in many areas including its response to the deadly Cyclone Nargis.
"These are signs that China, though it may seem to be the only country with a lot of influence on Burma's military rulers, are having a tough time with the generals, as they are forced to consider their interest," Mya Maung concludes.
King’s Anti-Imperialism and the Challenge for Obama
http://www.myjoyonline.com/tools/print/printnews.asp?contentid=25303
The Martin Luther King, Jr. that most Americans know is the man who said, "I have a dream" at a massive rally 250,000 strong in Washington, D.C., on August 28, 1963, while standing on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial during a March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. That speech is about racial justice and ultimate reconciliation in the United States, and with the changes wrought in American law and practice by the Civil Rights movement, it is a speech that Americans can still feel hopeful about, even if we have not, as Dr. King would have said, "gotten there yet."
But there was another King, the critic of the whole history of European colonialism in the global South, who celebrated the independence movements that led to decolonization in the decades after World War II. The anti-imperial King is the exact opposite of the Neoconservatives who set US policy in the early twenty-first century. Barack Obama, who inherits King’s Civil Rights legacy and is also burdened with the neo-imperialism of the W. era, has some crucial choices to make about whether he will heed the other King, or whether he will get roped into the previous administration’s neocolonial project simply because it is the status quo from which he will begin his tenure as commander in chief.
Cont’d (click below or on "comments")
The US so neglects its educational system that relatively few Americans are exposed to world history in school. Few of them know that roughly from 1757 to 1971 the great European powers systematically subjugated most of the peoples of the world. tiny Britain ruled gargantuan India, along with Burma (Myanmar), what is now Malaysia, Australia, some part of China, and large swaths of Africa (Egypt, Sudan, Gambia, Rhodesia/ Zimbabwe, South Africa, Tanzania, Ghana, etc., etc.) The colonial system was one of brutal exploitation of "natives" by Europeans, who derived economic, strategic and political benefits from this domination.
Dr. King frankly saw this imperial system as unadulterated evil. In his "The Birth of a New Nation," a sermon delivered at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church, Montgomery, Alabama on 7 April 1957, King, just back from Africa, lays out his vision of the liberation of the oppressed from the failing empires.
He begins by celebrating the independence of Ghana (formerly the Gold Coast) on March 6, 1957, and praising the man who led his country to sovereignty, Kwame Nkrumah. King and his wife, Coretta Scott King, had traveled to Ghana to attend the independence ceremonies. He saw the victory of Ghana over the British imperialists as exemplifying a yearning in human beings in all times and places for liberty: "Men realize that freedom is something basic, and to rob a man of his freedom is to take from him the essential basis of his manhood. To take from him his freedom is to rob him of something of God’s image."
The state of being colonized, of being under the thumb of another nation, another people, is from King’s point of view an existential disfigurement, robbing human beings of their status as theomorphic or created in the image of the divine.
King recalled the ceremonials that he had witnessed with his own eyes on African soil:
'’ The thing that impressed me more than anything else that night was the fact that when Nkrumah walked in, and his other ministers who had been in prison with him, they didn’t come in with the crowns and all of the garments of kings, but they walked in with prison caps and the coats that they had lived with for all of the months that they had been in prison . . . at twelve o’clock that night we saw a little flag coming down, and another flag went up. The old Union Jack flag came down, and the new flag of Ghana went up. This was a new nation now, a new nation being born. . . And when Prime Minister Nkrumah stood up before his people out in the polo ground and said, "We are no longer a British colony. We are a free, sovereign people," all over that vast throng of people we could see tears. And I stood there thinking about so many things. Before I knew it, I started weeping. I was crying for joy. And I knew about all of the struggles, and all of the pain, and all of the agony that these people had gone through for this moment.
After Nkrumah had made that final speech, it was about twelve-thirty now. And we walked away. And we could hear little children six years old and old people eighty and ninety years old walking the streets of Accra crying, "Freedom! Freedom!" They couldn’t say it in the sense that we’d say it-many of them don’t speak English too well-but they had their accents and it could ring out, "Free-doom!" They were crying it in a sense that they had never heard it before, and I could hear that old Negro spiritual once more crying out:
Free at last! Free at last!
Great God Almighty, I’m free at last!’
It was as he stood in the square at Accra after midnight on the first day of the independence of a former African colony that he remembered those lines, to which he referred again in his "I have a Dream" speech some six years later at the Lincoln Memorial. For King, Kwame Nkrumah was the Great Emancipator as much as Lincoln, and the achievement of civil rights for African Americans was a sort of decolonization, replicating the miracle of Ghana.
King recalled, in his 1957 sermon, how the new parliament was opened on a Wednesday and "here Nkrumah made his new speech. And now the prime minister of the Gold Coast with no superior, with all of the power that MacMillan of England has, with all of the power that Nehru of India has-now a free nation, now the prime minister of a sovereign nation." That phrase, "with no superior" was central to King’s thinking, both about decolonization and about civil rights in the US. Colonized Ghanaians had had a superior in the form of the British high commissioner, who set policy for them by fiat. African-Americans under Jim Crow had a superior. But Nkrumah, as of March 6, "had no superior."
King took away from his experience in Africa the lesson that social mobilization was necessary to gain freedom. It would not be gifted from on high, since colonial officials had no interest in abolishing their own power. But King also said he admired Nkrumah’s deployment of Gandhian techniques of nonviolent noncooperation to win independence.
He said he learned from the experience of Ghana that the quest for liberation would always be resisted, and that freedom workers should expect to go to jail, and to face fierce oppostion. He recalled of his return journey through London,
'’ remember we passed by Ten Downing Street. That’s the place where the prime minister of England lives. And I remember that a few years ago a man lived there by the name of Winston Churchill. One day he stood up before the world and said, "I did not become his Majesty’s First Minister to preside over the liquidation of the British Empire."
And I thought about the fact that a few weeks ago a man by the name of Anthony Eden [then British Prime Minister] lived there. And out of all of his knowledge of the Middle East, he decided to rise up and march his armies with the forces of Israel and France into Egypt, and there they confronted their doom, because they were revolting against world opinion. Egypt, a little country; Egypt, a country with no military power. They could have easily defeated Egypt, but they did not realize that they were fighting more than Egypt. They were attacking world opinion; they were fighting the whole Asian-African bloc, which is the bloc that now thinks and moves and determines the course of the history of the world.’
King was referring to the Suez War of 1956, in which Israel, the United Kingdom and France conspired against Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser, who had nationalized the Suez Canal that July. France feared Abdel Nasser because he gave hope and aid to the Algerian revolutionaries trying to end France’s empire there. Eden caricatured Abdel Nasser as a Mussolini figure needing to be taken down a notch lest the colonized countries get uppity in imitation of him. Israel, always expansionist and land hungry, sought to take and keep the Sinai Peninsula right up to the Suez Canal.
Although King attributed the failure of the tripartite plot to the "Afro-Asian bloc," it was actually President Dwight D. Eisenhower who intervened to push the three miscreants back out of Egypt. Ike was afraid that the Arab nationalists would go Communist if the colonial powers and Israel insisted on humiliating them or refusing to let go of Arab land under foreign occupation. Eisenhower pressured Israel to give up the Sinai, which it did sullenly.
It should be remembered that in 1956-57, Britain, France and many in the US viewed Egyptian leader Abdel Nasser as a fascist, a tyrant, a supporter of terrorism who encouraged Palestinians in Gaza to attack Israel. King was not taken in by the propaganda, which covered for neo-imperial acquisitiveness on the part of the aggressors.
We celebrate today the birth of a man who supported anticolonial trouble-makers such as Nkrumah and Abdel Nasser against the global forces of empire. I think we may deduce from this stance exactly how he would feel about Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s war on the people of Gaza.
King saw attaining civil rights in the US and decolonization in Africa and Asia as parallel processes. It could be argued that Nkrumah’s victory in 1957 was among the events that gave African-Americans hope in the Deep South.
Barack Obama told an anecdote about his father that reversed this causality. At the Brown Chapel A.M.E. church in Selma, Alabama, in March, 2007, 50 years after King saw Nkrumah become the ruler of a sovereign African country, Obama told the congregation:
’You see, my Grandfather was a cook to the British in Kenya. Grew up in a small village and all his life, that’s all he was — a cook and a house boy. And that’s what they called him, even when he was 60 years old. They called him a house boy. They wouldn’t call him by his last name.
Sound familiar?
He had to carry a passbook around because Africans in their own land, in their own country, at that time, because it was a British colony, could not move about freely. They could only go where they were told to go. They could only work where they were told to work.
Yet something happened back here in Selma, Alabama. Something happened in Birmingham that sent out what Bobby Kennedy called, “Ripples of hope all around the world.” Something happened when a bunch of women decided they were going to walk instead of ride the bus after a long day of doing somebody else’s laundry, looking after somebody else’s children. When men who had PhD’s decided that’s enough and we’re going to stand up for our dignity. That sent a shout across oceans so that my grandfather began to imagine something different for his son. His son, who grew up herding goats in a small village in Africa could suddenly set his sights a little higher and believe that maybe a black man in this world had a chance.
What happened in Selma, Alabama and Birmingham also stirred the conscience of the nation. It worried folks in the White House who said, “You know, we’re battling Communism. How are we going to win hearts and minds all across the world? If right here in our own country, John, we’re not observing the ideals set fort in our Constitution, we might be accused of being hypocrites. So the Kennedy’s decided we’re going to do an air lift. We’re going to go to Africa and start bringing young Africans over to this country and give them scholarships to study so they can learn what a wonderful country America is.
This young man named Barack Obama got one of those tickets and came over to this country. He met this woman whose great great-great-great-grandfather had owned slaves; but she had a good idea there was some craziness going on because they looked at each other and they decided that we know that the world as it has been it might not be possible for us to get together and have a child. There was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, Alabama, because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born. So don’t tell me I don’t have a claim on Selma, Alabama. Don’t tell me I’m not coming home to Selma, Alabama.’
Obama’s speech was also about the blessed estate of having "no superior," of not being a colonial subject, of not being called "boy" by one’s alleged social and racial "superiors."
Obama’s speech was an anticolonial one, which reversed the causation implicit in King’s description of the independence celebration in Ghana. Barack Obama, Sr., was the recipient of a scholarship from the Kennedy administration that was offered in part under the influence of the US Civil Rights Movement.
The Neoconservatives, like Winston Churchill himself as long as he lived, never gave up the imperial dream. They approved of the 1956 attack on Egypt by Israel, France and Britain. They approved of Western dominance of the countries of the global South. And Bush and his think tanks wanted to revive empire, to pretend it was 1920, and that the common people lacked the skills to mobilize to stop their project of domination.
Obama’s plan to order the beginning of a withdrawal from Iraq on day one of his administration is consistent with the anticolonialism of the King tradition and of Obama’s own autobiography.
But the dark clouds over the Obama administration are Afghanistan and Palestine. What Obama accomplishes on those two issues will powerfully shape his presidency. Only if he can avoid perpetuating colonial abuses in both can he hope to claim the mantle of anticolonialism from King and from his own father. For the Bush administration assiduously robbed other human beings of their status as images of the divine, and the US will not be whole until Afghans and Palestinians can say in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at Last, Free at Last, Great God Almighty, I’m Free at Last."
Credit: Juan Cole
Source: agoravox.com
Story from Myjoyonline.Com News:
http://news.myjoyonline.com/features/200901/25303.asp
Published: 1/20/2009
© Myjoyonline.com
Opposition Leaders Expect Obama to Stick to Burma Policy
http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=14958
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By SAW YAN NAING Tuesday, January 20, 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burmese opposition leaders expect US support for the pro-democracy movement to remain strong after President-elect Barack Obama takes office on Tuesday. Some said, however, the Burmese people themselves remained the most potent force for political change.
Nyan Win, spokesman for the National League for Democracy (NLD), told The Irrawaddy: “We believe that the US will keep up its support for human rights and the democracy movement in Burma.”
An ethnic Arakanese leader in Rangoon, Aye Tha Aung, chairman of the Arakan League for Democracy, said he didn’t expect greater support for political change in Burma. “The most important force for change in Burma are the Burmese people, opposition groups and ethnic leaders,” he said.
International pressure on the Burmese regime was still needed, however, he added.
Ludu Sein Win, a veteran Burmese journalist in Rangoon, said nothing more than condemnation of the regime could be expected from the Obama administration.
“I want to urge the Burmese people: Don’t rely on Obama and [UN Secretary-General] Ban Ki-moon,” Sein Win said. “We must rely on ourselves.”
Sanctions alone were not enough to bring about political change in Burma, Sein Win said. He thought that sanctions had only a small impact and were insufficient to bring down the regime.
Bo Kyi, joint secretary of the Thailand-based Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (Burma), said the Obama administration should maintain sanctions against the Burmese junta and its cronies.
Burma would not be a priority issue, however, in view of such immediate challenges as the conflict between Israel and Hamas and the US economic crisis.
Bo Kyi said Obama should try and persuade China and leaders of the Association of South East Asian Nations to work on a solution of the Burma question. “We also want him to try to find out common ground in cooperation with the UN Security Council’s five permanent members and 10 non-permanent members.”
Bo Kyi said he would also like to see the new US administration continue to pressure the Burmese junta to release all political prisoners, including democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, to enter into a tripartite dialogue with ethnic leaders and opposition and agree to a constitutional review.
European Commission provides 40.5 million euros in aid to Myanmar
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/asiapacific/news/article_1454582.php/European_Commission_provides_40.5_million_euros_in_aid_to_Myanmar_
Yangon - The European Commission has agreed to provide 40.5 million euros (52.4 million dollars) in humanitarian aid to Myanmar this year, with some of it aimed at assisting the Rohingya Muslims who are living 'in terrible conditions,' officials said Tuesday.
Of the 40.5 million euros allocated, some 22 million will go to assisting communities hard hit by Cyclone Nargis, which left 140,000 people dead and affected 2.4 million others in March 2008.
The remaining 18.5 million will target 'other highly vulnerable populations inside Myanmar, and Burmese refugees in Thailand,' said a statement issued by the European Commission.
'I am particularly concerned about the forgotten crisis in Northern Rakhine State, where some 800,000 Muslim Rohingya live in terrible conditions,' said European Commissioner for Development and Humanitarian Aid Louis Michel.
'Despite all our efforts, the situation there remains tragically static,' Michel said of the Rohingyas, a Muslim minority group that has been denied citizenship by the ruling Myanmar junta.
The Rohingyas have been denied citizenship and the right to own land or work in the Rhakine State, also called Arakan, despite having lived in the area for generations.
Myanmar government persecution forced at least 250,000 Rohingyas to flee to neighbouring Bangladesh in 1991 and 1992, where many remain refugees.
The plight of the stateless Rohingyas recently came to light after the Thai navy was accused last month of pushing back to sea about 1,000 Rohingya boat people, leaving at least 500 missing on the high seas.
The European Commission has been providing humanitarian aid to Myanmar since 1994.
The aid is strictly limited to humanitarian efforts, as Myanmar's ruling military regime is the target of European Union economic sanctions because of its atrocious human rights record.
Humanitarian aid increased substantially last year in the aftermath of the Cyclone Nargis disaster that hit Myanmar's Irrawaddy delta.
'The objective of our activities in Myanmar is solely humanitarian,' said Michel.
Pres. Bush Uses Authority to Alter Burmese JADE Act
http://www.diamonds.net/news/NewsItem.aspx?ArticleID=24978
By Jeff Miller Posted: 01/19/09 16:21
Submit Comment
RAPAPORT... President George W. Bush waived some provisions in the Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE Act against Myanmar on January 15, less than one week before leaving office. The bill, which was supported by many in the U.S. diamond and jewelry trade, was signed into law in July 2008 and was intended to prevent rubies and jade from entering the U.S. from Myanmar either directly or through third party countries.
The Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE Act of 2008 also froze the finances of Myanmar's military leaders and their families in all U.S.-owned banks. It also froze the assets of all parties, whether named explicitly or not, who support Myanmar's government, and made provisions for sanctions against those who choose to do so in the future. President Bush's waiver released those unnamed and future supporters, limiting sanctions to those already listed on the U.S. Treasury Department's list of blocked persons. "Because the imposition of effective and meaningful blocking sanctions requires the identification of those individuals and entities targeted for sanction and the authorization of certain limited exceptions to the prohibitions and restrictions that would otherwise apply, I hereby determine and certify that such a limited waiver is in the national interest of the United States," the president wrote in a memorandum to the secretary of state and the secretary of the treasury.
According to the orginal bill, the president was granted the authority to authorize changing provisions without congressional approval. Representative Howard Berman (Democrat-California), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, however, was not pleased. "I am disappointed at the decision to waive sanctions against all unnamed persons subject to the JADE Act, and believe it is contrary to the law." Berman said. "Now those who are supporting the Burmese military clique and who have not yet been publicly identified by the Treasury Department will get a free pass -- just what Congress was trying to prevent. It is puzzling that a president who has professed support for Burmese advocates for freedom has made a decision in his final days in office that was both unnecessary and so contrary to his past actions."
As a reminder to the U.S. trade: U.S. Customs & Border Protection is enforcing requirements for the import and export of rubies and jadeite from Myanmar, neither of which are permitted to enter the U.S. Customs has issued new Harmonized Tariff System codes for use for all non-Burmese rubies and jadeite, and jewelry containing these gemstones, imported into the U.S. Shipments of rubies and jadeite from non-Burmese sources must use these codes when entering the U.S. Importers are required to maintain full records related to purchase, manufacture and shipment of non-Burmese goods for five years, and to provide these records to customs upon request.
The importation ban does not apply to jadeite or rubies that are imported for personal use, meaning for personal wear by the importer. Furthermore, the bill does not address U.S. sales of any inventory of jadeite or rubies currently in the U.S. Importers and exporters can send questions to customs at jade.act@cbp.dhs.gov or read more at www.cbp.gov.
Full Text of President Bush's Order:
Title 3 -- The President -- Limited Waiver of Certain Sanctions Imposed by, and Delegation of Certain Authorities Pursuant to, the Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE (Junta's Anti-Democratic Efforts) Act of 2008 -- Memorandum for the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury
Document Number: Presidential Determination No. 2009-11 of January 15, 2009/Page Number: 3957
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including the Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE (Junta's Anti-Democratic Efforts) Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-286) (JADE Act) and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, in order to ensure that the United States Government's sanctions against the Burmese leadership and its supporters continue to be implemented effectively, to allow the reconciliation of measures applicable to persons sanctioned under the JADE Act with measures applicable to the same persons sanctioned under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), and to allow for the implementation of additional appropriate sanctions:
(1) I hereby waive, pursuant to section 5(i) of the JADE Act, the provisions of section 5(b) of the JADE Act with respect to those persons described in section 5(a)(1) of the JADE Act who are not included on the Department of the Treasury's List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. Because the imposition of effective and meaningful blocking sanctions requires the identification of those individuals and entities targeted for sanction and the authorization of certain limited exceptions to the prohibitions and restrictions that would otherwise apply, I hereby determine and certify that such a limited waiver is in the national interest of the United States.
(2) I hereby delegate to the Secretary of the Treasury the waiver authority set forth in section 5(i) of the JADE Act, including the authority to invoke or revoke the waiver with respect to any person or persons or any transaction or category of transactions or prohibitions by making the necessary determination and certification regarding the national interest of the United States set forth in that section. I hereby direct the Secretary of the Treasury, after consultation with the Secretary of State and with necessary support from the Intelligence Community, as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)), to continue to target aggressively the Burmese regime and its lines of support. I further delegate to the Secretary of the Treasury the authority to take such actions as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of section 5(b) of the JADE Act. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government consistent with applicable law. The authorities delegated to the Secretary of the Treasury under this memorandum shall be exercised after consultation with the Secretary of State.
(3) I authorize the Secretary of State, after consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, to take such actions as may be necessary to make the submissions to the appropriate congressional committees pursuant to section 5(d) of the JADE Act.
I hereby authorize and direct the Secretary of the Treasury to report this determination to the appropriate congressional committees and to publish it in the Federal Register .
/S/ George W. Bush
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, January 15, 2009
the obama vision for world international relations
http://www.streeteditors.com/archives/4884
Published by Sean Burkeon January 20, 2009in Opinion & Review.
Tags: climate-change, Hillary, International Relations, obama, USA.
SPREAD STREET EDITORS - SEND TO A FRIEND
A 79-page sneak preview is available into the minds of the two new US (and effectively world leaders) (elect) Obama and Hillary and how they plan on designing and implementing new US international policy initiatives. The Questions for the Record by Senator John Kerry to Hillary Rodham Clinton can be found here. As we have seen over the last several years, international policy directions by the US can have an umbrella effect on the policies and directions of many other countries, for good and bad. Therefore it is a worthwhile read to get a brief insight into how our lives and communities over the next several years may benefit (or not) from the incoming Administration of Obama.
Essentially, the 79-pages are broken down by questions and answers per country and general topic. Following is a brief summary of some of the responses. Direct answers from the report have been placed in quotation marks “”.
Climate Change - “Climate change is one of the most pressing challenges facing the United States and the global community. The United States will take a leadership role in combating the threat of global climate change from the beginning of the new Administration. The President-Elect has specifically pledged to set a goal of an 80% reduction in global emissions by 2050…”
Additionally, in response to a question regarding impacts of climate change on US national security, Obama “called (the) dependance on foreign oil and gas a national security crisis”. We can only hope that this might lead to stronger support of alternative fuel sources.
Also, in response to a question regarding the Climate Change Conferences in Bali and Poznan, where “one of the greatest points of disagreement between industrialized and developing countries (were the funding mechanisms) to support mitigation, adaptation and technology transfer”, Obama “believes (they) are key components of a global climate change deal… (and that they) will pursue mechanisms to achieve these goals…”.
Nuclear Weapons - “The Obama Administration will seek deep, verifiable reductions in all US and Russian nuclear weapons”. Additionally, the “Obama Administration plans to set a new direction in nuclear weapons policy, one that reflects the changed security conditions of the 21st century and that shows the world that the US takes seriously its existing commitment under the Nonproliferation Treaty”.
India and Pakistan - Obama and Hilary are both strongly committed to Senate approval of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty, and will launch diplomatic efforts to bring other states on board including India and Pakistan.
Iraq - Indication of continued support of the two Iraq withdraw timelines: all US combat forces shall withdraw from Iraqi cities and towns by June 30, 2009; and that all US forces shall withdraw from Iraq by December 31, 2011.
Iran - “The new Administration will present the Iranian regime with a clear choice” ; “refuse, and we will ratchet up the pressure, with stronger unilateral sanctions; stronger multilateral sanctions in the Security Council; and sustained action outside the UN to isolate the Iranian regime. A nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable…” However to put this in the context of the new Obama regime, Hilary has also highlighted the need for better preparations for negotiations. “The President-Elect has said that he is willing to engage in diplomacy with any leader”.
Syria - We “believe that engaging (in direct dialogue with Syria rather than through Turkish intermediaries as has been the case with the Bush Administration) increases the possibility of making progress”. Again highlighting Obama’s desire to be open to discussions with any leaders.
Israel - Palestine - Obama has “pledged to work actively from the beginning of his Administration to help Israel and the Palestinians achieve peace and security through a two-state solution”. Hilary also indicated that commitment has been pledged by both Israel and Palestine to the peace process as per the 2008 Annapolis conference, where both states indicating continued commitment even in the face of the recent and ongoing events in Gaza and southern Israel. (Let us hope this is the case.)
ICC - “Whether we work toward joining or not, we will end hostility towards the ICC, and look for opportunities to encourage effective ICC action in ways that promote US interests by bringing war criminals to justice.”
Asia
US - China (Taiwan + Tibet) - Hilary indicated that the US will maintain its “one China” policy; however that the “Obama Administration will speak out for the human rights and religious freedom of the people of Tibet.”
North Korea - Obama has “made clear his view that North Korea is not entitled to international support. He said that if North Korea did not live up to its obligations we may in fact reinstate some sanctions.” However, the Administration “will continue to address North Korea’s human rights abuses” as well as food aid through the World Food Program and US NGOs.
Burma - “The Obama Administration will support US trade and investment sanctions against Burma” however they must be “crafted, as in the Lantos Bill, to bring pressure on the regime itself, and seek … to spare the people of Burma further suffering.” Hilary believes they should “more fully explore possible modalities for humanitarian assistance that will reach the …people”.
Africa
Sudan (Darfur) - The “President-Elect and I have been very clear and forceful in our condemnation of the genocide in Sudan and in our commitment to far more robust actions to end the genocide and maximise protection for civilians”.
Zimbabwe - Responses to questions regarding Zimbabwe were more neutral, where the following quote can perhaps summarize the tone set as being diplomatically encouraging of the end of the Mugabe government. “The US and the World must take steps to address this growing crisis.”
South America
US - Latin / South American relations (including Cuba) - Obama “believes it makes both moral and strategic sense to restrict the restrictions on family visits and family cash remittances to Cuba.” Existing policy restricts Cuban Americas to sending home only $100 / month, and visiting family in Cuba only once every 3-year period.
Europe
A range of European issues was also responded to including democracy in Ukraine, democracy and relations with Russia, sovereignty integrity of Georgia, as well as advancing progress of the Dayton Agreement regarding Bosnia-Herzegovina. Hilary pledged enhanced support to overcoming divisions that have remained throughout the last 10 years, in order to allow Bosnia-Herzegovina to progress further.
Overall, the answers certainly suggest a lean toward more positiveness in the future. But as author Van Jones in his book “The Green Collar Economy” stated, “Barack Obama helped us take America back. Now we have to help him take America forward.” I think this applies to all people and all governments world-wide.
A challenge to power
http://english.dvb.no/news.php?id=2110
Jan 19, 2009 (DVB)–Professor Josef Silverstein called on the Burmese democracy movement to unite and take action to challenge the military government’s right to rule, in an interview with DVB.
Professor Silverstein is professor emeritus at Rutgers University in the United States and the author of two books on Burma.
DVB: What do you think of the National Council of the Union of Burma’s plan to found a new government in exile even though they already have the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma?
JS: “My point of view is I don’t see any need to change the government if there is nothing that that government could possibly do. For one thing, amongst the people living outside of the government of Burma, the military government, they are not really well organised, they have no authority, and as a result it seems to me to be a waste of time. If you’re going to look to form a new government amongst the Burmese people who are outside of Burma and do not come under the military, the question is: what will they do? How will they act? Are they going to try to pull all the people together? All the minorities, all the Burmans, everyone who is opposed to the military and is able to take some kind of political action?
“I think that might be a good idea, but it’s the second step, not the first step. The first step I was waiting to hear you say is that the NCGUB was reorganising itself or that the people who formerly supported the NCGUB now want to form a new government to replace that government and if that is what you’re asking me about, I don’t see any purpose of wasting time and wasting energy if a new government isn’t going to be able to do any more than what the present government is doing in the opposition.
“I think it’s a very important thing that for all these years since the military has been in power in – now Naypyidaw but before in Rangoon – that they have done whatever they wish without considering what the people want. There is no way for the people to express themselves. So I favour the idea of the opposition coming together and forming a genuine movement that speaks for the millions of Burmese people who reject the military and have no voice in the government. But unless you are talking about a genuine movement in which there will be an effort to bring all the people who are outside of the control of the military together, to organise and to begin to challenge the military’s right to rule and what they say, I don’t see that it’s worth the effort at this point.”
DVB: Some people are worry about the lack of unity in the exile community after this statement. Do you think unity in exile is stronger now?
JS: “I think that any effort to unite the people against the military and to have a spokesman and a spokesgroup that speaks for them that the people will listen to and follow would be a good thing, an important thing. But is has to be a change that will reflect a shift in power. There will be no shift in power if you just form a new government with the same people doing the same things. There has to be a shift in power to the people.
“If there is a movement in that direction and there is a real effort to unite the people, the Burmans, the minorities, the refugees and everyone else, then I think that would be important and a useful effort. But if that happens it’s going to cost a lot of bloodshed because the military will not allow them to organise but instead will try to put them down by force. So are you saying that there may be a group in Burma today in the opposition who believe it’s time to revolt against the military and challenge the military’s right to rule? Unless that is what they’re going to do, I think they’re going to by wasting their time, as they have been for the last several years.”
DVB: What are your views on the 2010 election?
JS: “If we’re talking about the elections proposed to be held in 2010 and if it’s going to be held under the constitution that the military wrote and put into place, that is not going to bring about any kind of shift in power. It’s just going to be another example of the military dictating how they are going to remain in power and what they are going to stand for. They’re not in any way looking to bring the people in and give them a voice in power or the right to challenge power. If my understanding is correct, then it is going to make no difference if the election is held in 2010, except it will legitimise the military in the eyes of many of the foreign countries which don’t really understand what’s going on in Burma, and as long as there is a government that seems to be able to exercise power and there’s no visible opposition they will go along with it. Now if that’s what the military is looking for, how they can get world attention and support for their movement, then I think they probably will.
“But what about the Burmese people? What about giving the Burmese people the right to govern themselves because that’s what the [Universal Declaration on Human Rights] says: people have the right to self-government. There is no self-government in Burma today; there is a military dictatorship which rules by force and violence. So if you’re talking about how we get change in Burma, there has to be a change in the opposition, the opposition has to first organise, get leaders who are ready to take action that will ultimately bring about change. Unless that happens, it is not a very useful activity.”
Reporting by Htet Aung Kyaw
Aung San Suu Kyi receives Trumpet of Conscience Award
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200901191231.htm
Washington (PTI): Burmese democratic icon Aung San Suu Kyi has been presented with the prestigious Trumpet of Conscience Award for leading the people of her country in the fight against the military junta.
The annual award is given by Realizing the Dream, a non-profit organization set up by Martin Luther King III in honour of his father great Martin Luther King Jr. The award is given on the occasion of birth anniversary of the great American leader. Monday happens to be his 80th birthday.
At a glittering function held last evening, a few blocks away from the US capitol, the award was presented by Queen Noor of Jordan to Aung Ding, executive director of US Campaign for Burma, on behalf of Aung San Suu Kyi.
"Daw Aung San Suu Kyi epitomizes the ideals of this award," Queen Noor said in her speech. "She is a freedom fighter and passionate advocate for the use of non-violent action against repression and military force," she said.
"A dedicated practicnor of Buddhism, a dedicated student of Gandhian principles and a follower of King's teachings, Aung San Suu Kyi has led her followers in Burma to engage the repressor with calm, passion and collective conviction," Queen Noor said.
In his speech, Aung Din hoped that President-elect Barack Obama will uphold existing economic sanctions and lead a strong diplomatic effort to organize international community to put collective pressure on Myanmar's military regime.
Among other awardees at the yesterday function were Rev Claude William Black Jr (Testament of Hope), Rep. John Lewis (Drum Major) and Senator Edward M Kennedy (Realizing the Dream). Last year, former US President Bill Clinton had received Realizing the Dream Award.
Toward the Union of a Divided Burma
http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=14943
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By SHWE YOE Monday, January 19, 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The barber stood at the door of his shop, waiting for customers. He didn’t have to wait long—a Tibetan-looking man in a traditional ethnic shirt, carrying a shoulder bag, stopped in front of him. “Good morning, sir,” he said in a strong ethnic accent.
"Good morning," the barber replied with a warm smile. “Please, come in and sit down.”
As he set to work on the man’s hair, the barber attempted to break the ice. "Unless I’m mistaken,” he said. “You’re from up north? Maybe from Kachin State?”
“Yes, I am,” replied the man.
“Your first time to the capital … I mean … to the ex-capital?” asked the barber.
“Oh, no, no, no,” the Kachin said. “I come here regularly.”
The barber nodded and continued cutting the man’s short black hair.
“This used to be such a beautiful city,” the Kachin said after a moment. “It seems so dirty and downtrodden now.”
The barber smiled and snipped lightly behind the man’s ears.
“No electricity, no sanitation. It seems that everything is broken in Yangon nowadays,” the Kachin whispered. “Not like the towns in China—they’re clean and well-organized.”
“Well, maybe things will change after the election in 2010 when we are demo-cratic,” replied the barber, purposely mispronouncing "democratic." He looked directly at the Kachin in the mirror and raised his eyebrow.
There was a minute’s silence. The Kachin man stared back at the barber in the mirror and then sighed. “I wouldn’t bet on it, my friend,” he said. “I’ve just come from a meeting at the offices of Myanmar Economic Holdings. They were asking about the jade and comparing the collateral from the mines to the budget just to run the election.”
“I see,” the barber said, innocently. “But what about all that money we’re supposed to be making by selling natural gas? I heard that the government had banked upward of US $3 billion in gas sales alone.”
The Kachin didn’t answer. He looked at the barber in the mirror again and shrugged. The barber nodded in response.
“Would you like it any shorter?” the barber asked.
“What?” the Kachin said with surprise.
“Your hair, sir,” said the barber with a smile, holding a hand-mirror behind the man’s head.
“Oh! Yes, of course. I mean, no. No. That’s fine. Very good, in fact,” the Kachin man said. “Just a shave, if you will.”
“Certainly, sir,” the barber said and went to fetch some water.
When he returned he asked: “Excuse me, my friend. Forgive me for asking. But are you, by any chance, a member of the Kachin Independence Organization?”
“Is it so obvious?” smiled the Kachin.
The barber chuckled. “I heard that the KIO had announced it wouldn’t contest the elections next year,” the barber said. “Apparently they changed their minds.”
He turned away casually, frothing up some foam in a cup with a shaving brush.
The Kachin looked around at the door and checked no one was there. Then he turned back to the barber and said, “The problem, old boy, is the pyidaungsu hluttaw [Union Parliament], the pyithu hluttaw [People's Parliament] and the amyotha hluttaw [National Parliament]. Every cabinet will be laced with 25 percent military officers. Nothing will ever change! There is too much centralized authority.”
“Not enough space for a federal government?” asked the barber.
“Indeed!” said the Kachin firmly.
The barber waited a minute and then asked: “And what about the disarmament? I heard that all the ceasefire groups would lay down their weapons. In fact, I read in the newspaper that the DKBA would act as a border patrol. Will the KIO do the same thing?”
“Well,” the customer said. “I don’t think we’ll settle for anything as pathetic as the DKBA did. Instead, I personally like the way the Wa are going about things.
“The UWSA are now issuing documents stamped ‘Government of Wa State, Special Autonomous Region, Union of Myanmar.’ That’s a pretty sure sign they’re getting ready to establish their own authority.”
“What is the junta saying about that?” the barber whispered.
“I don’t think the generals can say too much at present,” the Kachin muttered. “They need as many ethnic groups on board as they can get. Too much loose talk about ceasefire groups following Maung Maung and his plan to form a parallel government after 2010.”
“Maybe the Karen, Mon, and Shan leaders will follow if Maung Maung promises a power-sharing deal with the ethnic opposition,” the barber suggested with an innocent shrug, laying his scissors on the table.
“My friend, that’s why we’ve changed our minds and don’t want to bet on the junta’s road map,” the Kachin whispered, sitting up and looking directly at the barber.
Just then, another customer entered the store and the two men fell silent.
“I’ll be with you in one minute,” called the barber with a smile. The customer sat down just as the Kachin stood up.
He looked at the barber and smiled carefully.
He rummaged in his pocket and suddenly looked shocked. “Oh my!” he exclaimed. “I don’t have any money. How stupid!”
He leaned closer to the barber and whispered: “Myanmar Economic Holdings couldn’t afford to pay us for the jade this month. They asked us for credit. I wonder, my friend, if you could do the same. Could I pay you next month when I’m back in Rangoon?”
“Don’t worry about it,” shrugged the barber. “Save your money. Let’s call it my contribution to a federal union.”
Burmese Lawyer Detained
http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=14949
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By THE IRRAWADDY Monday, January 19, 2009
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the Burmese regime intensifies its crackdown on dissidents, Poe Phyu, a young Burmese lawyer, who has represented farmers and labor rights activists, was arrested and detained by authorities on Friday.
Thirty-year-old Poe Phyu was arrested by police officers in Aunglan Township in Magwe Division in central Burma soon after defending a group of Aunglan farmers whose lands had been confiscated by Burmese authorities, according to Bo Kyi, joint secretary of the Thailand-based Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (Burma).
Poe Phyu, who lives in Rangoon, was arrested while boarding a bus in Aunglan to return home, he said.
Meanwhile, the two labor rights activists Hla Soe and Zaw Htay he defended were also detained after they collectively sent a letter of complaint about their land confiscation to the International Labor Organization, he added.
In October 2008, four defense lawyers—Saw Kyaw Kyaw Min, Nyi Nyi Htwe, Aung Thein and Khin Maung Shein—were sentenced to prison terms of between four and six months for contempt of court after complaining of unfair treatment.
The lawyers had represented political activists, such as members of the 88 Generation Students group, and members of the opposition National League for Democracy.
Recently, one of the four, Saw Kyaw Kyaw Min, 29, who was sentenced in absentia, fled to Thailand.
Speaking to The Irrawaddy, Saw Kyaw Kyaw Min condemned the Burmese court for its lack of justice. There are no fair trials in Burma as defense lawyers are denied the right to defend their clients, he said.
The regime has been using the court to put pressure on activists and dissidents by pronouncing long terms of imprisonment, said Saw Kyaw Kyaw Min.
Burmese Lacquerware Loses Its Shine
http://www.irrawaddy.org/highlight.php?art_id=14946
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By KYI WAI / RANGOON Monday, January 19, 2009
Burma’s famous lacquerware is losing its shine. Less than one third of the more than 200 lacquerware factories and small workshops operating in the early 1990s in Pagan, one of the country’s major tourist destinations, are still in business.
Chan Aye’s family-run lacquerware business is the latest to go to the wall. The small factory, in Myin Kabar village, outside Pagan, was doing well when Chan Aye took it over from his father in 2000.
Since 2005, however, rising production costs and falling numbers of visiting tourists took their toll. Chan Aye finally gave up the struggle to keep afloat the business that had supported at least two generations of his family since colonial times. “It’s a hard blow,” he said.
The closure of Chan Aye’s factory adds one more statistic to the rising number of business failures in Pagan. Last year, the city and nearby villages had just 11 lacquerware factories and 60 smaller plants, compared to the more than 200 manufacturers supported by a buoyant tourist trade in the early 1990s.
About 70 percent of the city’s workforce is employed in the industry. Virtually every family in Chan Aye’s village depends on the trade in lacquerware.
More than 90 percent of the lacquerware produced in Pagan is sold to visiting tourists and the slump in tourism to Burma in recent years has dealt a crippling blow to the industry. Exports to China and Japan have plummeted.
Rising prices of raw materials, particularly resin, have also taken their toll.
"A tin of resin (approximately 15.3 kilograms) that sold 15 years ago for 5,000 kyat now costs 200,000 kyat,” said lacquerware manufacturer Sein Win. “Small businesses are being forced out of the market or are becoming sub-contractors to big industry."
Lacquerware has been produced in Pagan for centuries, perhaps as far back as at the time of the city’s foundation 1,000 years ago. Techniques were passed from one generation to the next, and the family manufacturing tradition is still carried on today.
Foreign interest in Pagan lacquerware grew rapidly over the past 45 years and contributed to a steady growth in the size and success of the industry—until the recent tourism crisis, which saw the numbers of foreign visitors arriving at Rangoon and Mandalay airports drop from 260,000 in 2006 to 177,000 in 2008.
Closures of lacquerware factories increase in direct proportion to the fall in tourist arrivals. As factories and workshops close, young people are turning their backs on the age-old craft and looking for alternative work in Pagan and other cities—and some are predicting that Burmese lacquerware may eventually be consigned to museum showcases.
SEAPA Alert: Australian author gets 3-year jail term in Thailand
19 January 2009
A Thai court sentenced an Australian author to three years'
imprisonment for insulting a member of the royal family, media
reports said.
"The Nation" online said Harry Nicolaides, 41, pleaded guilty to
lese majeste charges, prompting the court to reduce what was
originally a six-year jail term into three years instead.
Nicolaides' novel "Verisimilitude", allegedly made critical remarks
on Thailand's crown prince.
Lese majeste is a criminal offense in Thailand.
He was arrested on August 31, 2008 in Suvarnabhumi International
Airport, shortly before he was to board a flight back to his
country.
In an interview shortly after his arrest, Nicolaides issued a
public apology.
------------------------------------------------------------
Southeast Asian Press Alliance.
538/1 Samsen Rd., Dusit, Bangkok 10300.
Tel: 66-2-2435579, 66-2-2435373, Fax: 66-2-2448749
To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?LIwcjIyMtCzMDBysTJzstEa0LEzszIys7A==
LDP pledges to unite behind Aso
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/mail/nn20090119a1.html
Monday, Jan. 19, 2009
Party to put economy front and center in upcoming election
By MASAMI ITO
Staff writer
The ruling Liberal Democratic Party held its annual convention Sunday to gear up for the upcoming Lower House general election, vowing to unite under Prime Minister Taro Aso and win one of the toughest battles it has ever faced.
Aso, who is president of the LDP, expressed his determination to lead the party to victory in the election that must be held this year because the terms of Lower House members end in September.
"Out of all of the political parties, the LDP is the only party that can come up with measures to tackle" the current economic crisis, Aso told the convention in Tokyo.
Convention participants were keenly conscious of the opposition parties led by the LDP's main rival, the Democratic Party of Japan, which pundits say could win the election and seize power from the LDP-New Komeito coalition.
"Let's appeal to the public with the unwavering belief that the DPJ's intention to seize government power is only an illusion," the LDP's 2009 campaign platform adopted Sunday says.
LDP Secretary General Hiroyuki Hosoda harshly criticized the DPJ, saying it is placing priority on its own interests and stonewalling Diet business.
"We cannot yield government power to such an irresponsible party," Hosoda said. "Let us be confident and proud of the 50 years of the party's history during which we moved forward together with the public — and let's unite and win the election."
Aso and Hosoda made no reference to U.S. President-elect Barack Obama, who will take office this week. But in a written statement, the LDP promised to deepen relations with the United States.
"In the U.S., the new Obama administration will be formed," the statement adopted at the convention says. "We will strengthen Japan-U.S. relations even more, and cooperate on various issues, including the economy, finance and defense."
New Komeito leader Akihiro Ota made an appearance and stressed the strong ties between the two parties, promising to fight the election together.
"We must win the Lower House general election at any cost and we must send out a message that only the LDP-New Komeito coalition can lead (Japan) to overcome this difficult time," Ota said. "The ruling coalition shall win a majority . . . and that will be a victory for the public as well."
The coalition was formed in 1999, but recent relations have been rocky because of various disagreements, including the timing of the election, a consumption tax hike and the ¥2 trillion cash handout program.
With Aso and his Cabinet wallowing amid plunging public support — below 20 percent in a recent Kyodo News survey — the cooperation of New Komeito, which is backed by Japan's largest lay Buddhist organization, in the Lower House election is a must.
Over 1,000 Chinese workers in Burma’s Chibwe hydropower project
http://mqvu.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/over-1000-chinese-workers-in-burmas-chibwe-hydropower-project/
International Rivers has picked up this article, written by KNG and dated 13 January, from the Kachin News website.
To expedite the hydropower project in N’Mai River at Chibwe city in
Burma’s northern Kachin state, about 1,000 Chinese workers have been inducted in the project site since late December, 2008, said local sources. (…) The Chinese workers are employed by China’s
China Power Investment Corporation (CPI) and they are working together with about 300 Burmese workers of the Burma-Asia World Company which is owned by Burma’s former drug king Lo Hsing Han, residents of Chibwe said. (…)
Mr. Awng Wa, an anti-dam activist and chairman of Kachin Development Networking Group (KDNG) based on the Sino-Burma border told KNG today, “Chinese companies working under CPI in Chibwe hydropower project are also taking out valuable minerals from the project areas to China while working for the hydropower project.” (…)
Owners of restaurants in Chibwe are also seriously suffering and are
about to close their shops because the workers in Asia World Company eat daily at their restaurants without paying for the past six months to a year. On the other hand, owners of house construction stores have to provide the materials demanded by the company without getting payment for a long time.
The shop owners are unable to complain to the CPI and Asia World
Company because they are strongly backed by the Burmese ruling junta, added local residents.
Chibwe hydropower project is one of a total seven hydropower projects in Mali and N’Mai Rivers in Kachin state which is being built by the CPI and Asia World Company of the junta since 2006. The Chibwe hydropower project will generate a total of 2,000 MW of electricity.
According to sources from the two companies, the Chibwe hydropower project is being implemented under a 20-year project.
What surprised me about this article is that there are anti-dam groups operating on the Burma-China border. What, NGOs in Burma? I have imagined that border region to be ultramilitarized and ultrapoor, not the sort of place you’d have lots of space for dissidence or “civil society” (though Chinese merchants in Boten, who had come over from there, say that the environment was more “modern” than in Laos). So I am very curious about this “anti-dam group.” This would be a great place to check what a people who have (or so it is said in Western accounts) been pressganged and terrorised by various armies and drug lords for long actually think about development imported from China. This article certainly suggests that military-style requisitioning is still in fashion, to the benefit of the Chinese managers now.
Another point to note is that Lo Hsing Han, by the sound of his name, is probably Chinese; but is he a former KMT or a former Red Guard/BCP? Guo Xiaolin in her work on Burma-China relations (see Bibliography, Working Paper 1) does point out that a number of former Red Guards went over the border to aid the Burmese Communist Party and then became major drug players.
This entry was posted on January 18, 2009 at 10:14 am and is filed under Southeast Asia. Tagged: Burma, hydropower. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply
Myanmar provides 10,000 fishing boats for fishery recovery work
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-01/18/content_10677325.htm
www.chinaview.cn 2009-01-18 12:25:02 Print
YANGON, Jan. 18 (Xinhua) -- The Myanmar government has provided 10,000 fishing boats to fishermen in cyclone-hit areas in country's southwestern Ayeyawaddy delta to help fishery recovery work, according to the Fisheries Federation Sunday.
In addition to those supplied by the Myanmar government, the Singapore government and the country's well wishers have also donated 200 fishing boats and 200 fishing nets to survived fishermen in two cyclone-hit areas in the delta area to reinforce the fishery undertakings after storm, the sources said.
According to an earlier local report, a total of 9,500 fishing boats, spoiled in the May storm, have been rebuilt for fishermen to revive their fishery undertakings in areas such as Laputta, Ngaputaw, Mawlamyinegyun, Phyapon, Bogalay, Dedaye and some other storm-hit areas in Yangon division.
Meanwhile, under an agreement signed late last year between a Britain-based international non-governmental organization, the Action Aid, and the Myanmar Fisheries Federation, the Action Aid provided a total of 10 million U.S. dollars for the recovery of the fishery sector in the Hainggyi Kyun in the Ayeyawaddy delta for a period of four years.
An additional 2 million dollars in aid for the fishery sector was also sought from another INGO of Oxfam, then report said.
Deadly tropical cyclone Nargis hit five divisions and states - Ayeyawaddy, Yangon, Bago, Mon and Kayin on May 2 and 3 last year, of which Ayeyawaddy and Yangon inflicted the heaviest casualties and massive infrastructural damage.
The storm has killed 84,537 people, leaving 53,836 missing and 19,359 injured according to official death toll.
Editor: Wang Guanqun
Myanmar fruit export through border trade increases in 2008
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-01/18/content_10677114.htm
www.chinaview.cn 2009-01-18 10:58:07 Print
YANGON, Jan. 18 (Xinhua) -- Myanmar's fruit export to neighboring countries through border trade in 2008 amounted to 120,000 tons, up from 2007, the local Biweekly Eleven reported in this week's issue.
Of Myanmar's neighboring countries, China imported Myanmar fruits most compared with others such as Thailand and India, the report said.
Tropical fruits such as pine-apple, musk melon, pomelo, avocado pear, asparagus and chilli are mainly exported by Myanmar.
Myanmar has been placing emphasis on production of high-yield fruits and vegetables to boost export, taking advantage of the country's fair climatic conditions and geographic superiority.
The expanded production of quality fruits and vegetables will not only satisfy domestic demand but also generate foreign exchange earnings, thereby contributing to enhancing the socio-economic life of the entire people, agricultural experts said.
There are 100 kinds of kitchen crops including over 70 kinds of fruits produced by Myanmar along with vegetables.
Sown areas of fruit trees have reached 729,000 hectares in Myanmar, while that of vegetable 405,000 hectares and that of kitchen crops such as chilli, onion and potato 263,250 hectares, official report said.
Myanmar is also rich with other tropical fruit resources such as banana, strawberry, durian, mangos teen, papaya, coconut and so on.
According to a latest statistics of the Ministry of Commerce, Myanmar exported 80,000 tons of various items of fruits through border trade in the first nine months (April-December) of the fiscal year 2008-09, gaining over 17 millions U.S. dollars, while it imported over 50,000 tons of other fruits worth of 10 million dollars from the neighboring countries.
Editor: Wang Guanqun
Anger Myanmar's rulers, and lose all
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20090118/article/901180366&tc=yahoo
By THOMAS FULLER THE NEW YORK TIMES
Published: Sunday, January 18, 2009 at 1:00 a.m.
Last Modified: Sunday, January 18, 2009 at 8:21 a.m.
MAE SOT, Thailand - By the time he contracted tuberculosis, U Htay Aung, a dissident jailed for seven years in Myanmar, was incapable of telling prison guards about his condition. He had already lost his voice from years of exposure to the cold concrete floor that prisoners slept on.
Click to enlarge
INTERNATIONAL HERALD TRIBUNE / THOMAS FULLER U Kyaw Kyaw Min, a lawyer for dissidents, fled to Thailand last year under the threat of prosecution by Myanmar's government. So Htay Aung decided to announce his illness in a more graphic form. He coughed up enough blood to fill a small cup. "When the guard came around, I showed him," said Htay Aung, who has now recuperated but whose voice remains raspy. "They transferred me to the leprosy ward."
Htay Aung recently told the story to a reporter and a handful of former political prisoners who have settled in this small Thai city on the border with Myanmar, formerly known as Burma. Many of them work at the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, a group that tracks the plights of the more than 2,100 jailed dissidents in Myanmar and organizes aid for them and their families.
Founded nine years ago, the association has never been busier.
Last year, the Burmese military government sentenced 410 dissidents to prison terms ranging from a few years to six decades or more. The association lists details of the convictions in its online database, which is widely consulted by diplomats, U.N. officials and human rights workers. U Bo Kyi, the co-founder of the association, says that an additional 600 dissidents are in detention and have yet to be tried.
Among those convicted last year was an 80-year-old Buddhist nun, Daw Ponnami, who was given four years of hard labor for her involvement in street demonstrations led by Buddhist monks in September 2007. She has been spared the hard labor, the association says, but in what may be the final humiliation of her twilight years, her conviction was for insulting Buddhism.
A well-known comedian known as Zarganar was sentenced to 59 years in prison after criticizing the government for neglecting the victims of the cyclone that swept through lower Myanmar in May, killing more than 130,000 people.
U Gambira, a monk who helped lead the 2007 protests, was sentenced to 68 years.
Other political prisoners are listed in the database as farmers, a blogger, an ice cream seller, a bus conductor and a hip-hop singer in a band called Acid. All angered the government in one way or another.
In U.N. reports and diplomatic cables, Burmese political prisoners are often just a statistic, a measurement of the many human rights abuses carried out by Myanmar's generals.
But to members of the association, the prisoners are part of a fraternity of fellow dissidents who have many needs. The association helps family members smuggle medicine, reading materials, blankets, clothing and food to the prisoners.
Occasionally guards are sympathetic, Bo Kyi said. Often they help just because they are poor and need the small bribes that prisoners and family members pay them.
Even the most basic necessities can require payment.
"If you want to get more water for a shower you have to pay money," Bo Kyi said.
Some prisons are so crowded that prisoners can sleep only on their sides. But guards reserve "VIP" corners where prisoners can lie flat on their backs -- for a fee.
The association's annual budget of $200,000 is financed by the U.S. government's National Endowment for Democracy, the Dutch government and private donors.
The budget also helps pay to whisk out of the country dissidents in danger of arrest.
Two years ago the association sent $100 to U Aung Kyaw Oo, a former student activist who spent 14 years in prison, to help him escape Myanmar. He made it to Thailand.
"It feels better than inside," he said. "They can't arrest me here."
Myanmar's most famous political prisoner, the Nobel laureate and pro-democracy leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, is barred by the military government from leaving her lakeside house in a plush neighborhood of Yangon, the commercial capital, formerly known as Rangoon. Her cause is championed by a wide variety of people across the globe, including foreign leaders and college students in the United States.
But most political prisoners in Myanmar live much more anonymously and in much more rudimentary conditions.
To be a political prisoner in Myanmar, Bo Kyi said, is to truly experience darkness. Prisoners are often let out of their cells only 20 minutes a day, he said.
"We gave up our best years," Bo Kyi said, as he scanned the wall of photographs. But he does not want revenge on the government, he said. "What we want is very simple," he said. "Just freedom of speech."