Peaceful Burma (ျငိမ္းခ်မ္းျမန္မာ)平和なビルマ

Peaceful Burma (ျငိမ္းခ်မ္းျမန္မာ)平和なビルマ

TO PEOPLE OF JAPAN



JAPAN YOU ARE NOT ALONE



GANBARE JAPAN



WE ARE WITH YOU



ဗိုလ္ခ်ဳပ္ေျပာတဲ့ညီညြတ္ေရး


“ညီၫြတ္ေရးဆုိတာ ဘာလဲ နားလည္ဖုိ႔လုိတယ္။ ဒီေတာ့ကာ ဒီအပုိဒ္ ဒီ၀ါက်မွာ ညီၫြတ္ေရးဆုိတဲ့အေၾကာင္းကုိ သ႐ုပ္ေဖာ္ျပ ထားတယ္။ တူညီေသာအက်ဳိး၊ တူညီေသာအလုပ္၊ တူညီေသာ ရည္ရြယ္ခ်က္ရွိရမယ္။ က်ေနာ္တုိ႔ ညီၫြတ္ေရးဆုိတာ ဘာအတြက္ ညီၫြတ္ရမွာလဲ။ ဘယ္လုိရည္ရြယ္ခ်က္နဲ႔ ညီၫြတ္ရမွာလဲ။ ရည္ရြယ္ခ်က္ဆုိတာ ရွိရမယ္။

“မတရားမႈတခုမွာ သင္ဟာ ၾကားေနတယ္ဆုိရင္… သင္ဟာ ဖိႏွိပ္သူဘက္က လုိက္ဖုိ႔ ေရြးခ်ယ္လုိက္တာနဲ႔ အတူတူဘဲ”

“If you are neutral in a situation of injustice, you have chosen to side with the oppressor.”
ေတာင္အာဖရိကက ႏိုဘယ္လ္ဆုရွင္ ဘုန္းေတာ္ၾကီး ဒက္စ္မြန္တူးတူး

THANK YOU MR. SECRETARY GENERAL

Ban’s visit may not have achieved any visible outcome, but the people of Burma will remember what he promised: "I have come to show the unequivocal shared commitment of the United Nations to the people of Myanmar. I am here today to say: Myanmar – you are not alone."

QUOTES BY UN SECRETARY GENERAL

Without participation of Aung San Suu Kyi, without her being able to campaign freely, and without her NLD party [being able] to establish party offices all throughout the provinces, this [2010] election may not be regarded as credible and legitimate. ­
United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon

Where there's political will, there is a way

政治的な意思がある一方、方法がある
စစ္မွန္တဲ့ခိုင္မာတဲ့နိုင္ငံေရးခံယူခ်က္ရိွရင္ႀကိဳးစားမႈရိွရင္ နိုင္ငံေရးအေျဖ
ထြက္ရပ္လမ္းဟာေသခ်ာေပါက္ရိွတယ္
Burmese Translation-Phone Hlaing-fwubc

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

US shifts policy on Myanmar

http://www.bt.com.bn/en/opinion/2008/11/26/us_shifts_policy_on_myanmar

Nehginpao Kipgen
ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND


Wednesday, November 26, 2008


IN AN apparent shift from the policy of traditional sanctions, the US Congress created a post for policy chief for Myanmar to increase pressure on the military junta.



In response to this unprecedented action, the White House announced the nomination of Michael Green for the post on November 10. Whether this manoeuvre brings vigour to the Myanmar's democratic movement is a question remains to be seen.



Green, who has served as a senior director for Asian Affairs under the Bush administration, should have noticed the quandary over the Myanmar's political imbroglio, especially the futility of conflicting approaches by the international community.




According to this legislation, the policy chief will consult with the governments of China, India, Thailand and Japan, members of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), and the European Union to coordinate international strategy.



Years of sanctions after sanctions, this is a new birth in the American policy toward Myanmar. Sanctions, however, still remain the popular way of punishing the rogue regimes and governments around the world.



When it comes to Myanmar, sanctions have little impact on the military regime due to engagements by neighbouring countries, notably China, India and members of Asean.



A solution to Myanmar's problems greatly lies in two possible ways: Popular Uprising and Intervention. Popular uprising have been tasted twice in 1988 and in 2007. Both events were brutally crushed by the military with force.



The word intervention can be engagement or sanction. There is no doubt about the US sanctions hurting the military generals and also the general public. Had there been a coordinated international approach, Burma could have been different today.



It must be difficult for the US government to abandon its traditional policy of isolating the Myanmar's generals and start engaging with them. But they have to realise that sanction alone is not effective in resolving Myanmar's crisis when there is engagement on the other end. While sanctions are in place, the new envoy can start initiating a "carrot and stick" policy by working together with key international players. The one similar to the North Korean six-party talk model should be given emphasis on Myanmar.



The six-party talks involving the United States, European Union, Asean, China, India, and Burma should be initiated. In the beginning, the military generals and some other countries might resist the proposal, but we need to remember that the North Korean talk was also initially not supported by all parties.

The hard work of the US in North Korea is now paid off with North Korea being removed from the State Department's list of terrorists, and in return, North Korea promised to shut down and dismantle its nuclear facilities.



It was not only the sticks that worked but also the carrots. The US offered energy and food assistances to the North Korean leadership. A similar initiative could convince Myanmar's military generals to come to the negotiating table.



Now that the UN Secretary General is heavily involved in the process, the US can garner stronger support from the international community. Without such move from the US, Ban Ki-moon's "Group of Friends of the Secretary General on Myanmar" will yield little. The most effective UN intervention would happen when the Security Council decides to take action. This scenario is bleak with China and Russia vetoing the move, and likely to do again if Burma issue comes up in the Council's agenda.



The creation of US special envoy and policy chief for Myanmar is a widely welcome move. With this new position coming into place, the US should start moving beyond imposing sanctions.



Nehginpao Kipgen is the General Secretary of US-based Kuki International Forum (www.kukiforum.com) and a researcher on the rise of political conflicts in modern Burma (1947-2004).

The Brunei Times

0 comments: